The Deliverability Series - Chris Arrendale, Part 2


The Deliverability Series is a collection of conversations intended to shed light on the intricate nature of deliverability and compliance.

Chris Arrendale is a Software, Email Marketing and Deliverability professional. He’s a known expert for problem solving in the email deliverability, privacy, and software space and is also an active member of multiple email organizations. Arrendale is the CEO & Principal Deliverability Consultant of Inbox Pros and has worked as a Deliverability Expert at several reputable consulting firms and ESPs.

"When I was at an ESP, one of the fears or things that kept me up at night was when a new client would send that initial send - what’s going to happen? All the ESPs I’ve worked for had built-in alerts and countermeasures against that, but if somebody hit send and had a 40-50-60% hard bounce rate, you’re going to have a lot of problems. You’re going to wake up the next day and wish you hadn’t let that person on the system."

When a client comes to you with deliverability problems, do you have a way to vet the client and their data?

Mostly, it’s a question and answer session, like a pre-sales kick-off call. I look at and ask questions about how long they’ve been sending, about their list - how they acquired it, how large it is, how often they send. I ask them to send me some creative samples, their website URL. It’s more about vetting them to see if I would be a good fit for them. Sometimes I’ve turned down clients, not only because they were sending borderline spam, but because I’m not the right person to help them - they might need more of a creative consultant, or a different type of consultant than what I can help them with.

I usually do kind of a mini-audit, it’s usually a quick 30 minutes to an hour call at the most. And of course, I always look at their privacy policy, just to make sure how they’re storing and collecting data, and that it’s not going against their own policy or true ethics.

"Majority of the time, it’s not an ESP that’s causing the problem, it could be that maybe the client has been sending to an older list, maybe they’ve purchased a list, maybe they’ve changed their sending domain without notifying the ESP and gotten the correct DNS records."

Whether an agency, an ESP or a consultant, do you think it’s better to have an actual human reviewing data rather than having it automated?

It’s difficult. If everybody had extra hours in their day to look over it, that’d be great. I think that having automation is the best because you can quickly get through it, get the data, details, and percentages. What I’ve done when I’ve been in that situation, is take chunks of the list in random intervals or sort the list and look at it in a few different ways manually - just eyeballing it to figure out if there should be problems or will be problems with the list - maybe doing certain search terms to find typo email addresses, things like that. For the most part, I agree that automation is a lot faster and a lot more effective.

While it may be better to have a human all of the time, it doesn’t scale. When I was at an ESP, one of the fears or things that kept me up at night was when a new client would send that initial send - what’s going to happen? All the ESPs I’ve worked for had built-in alerts and countermeasures against that, but if somebody hit send and had a 40, 50, 60% hard bounce rate, you’re going to have a lot of problems. You’re going to wake up the next day and wish you hadn’t let that person on the system.

There have been a few ESPs here recently that have started asking everyone to confirm their list. If you confirm your list, your open and click numbers should increase drastically. It’s difficult, because you’re always going to have that one malicious sender that possibly gets through.

Is it typical a client would continue working with you, but want to switch ESPs?

Most of the time, that is a question that does come up. A client will want me to do an ESP review, and ask if there’s an ESP that would work better for them. Majority of the time, it’s not an ESP that’s causing the problem, it could be that maybe the client has been sending to an older list, maybe they’ve purchased a list, maybe they’ve changed their sending domain without notifying the ESP and gotten the correct DNS records. I don’t think I’ve ever recommended someone switch to a different ESP or marketing automation provider just because they’re having deliverability problems.

If one thing could happen in the email deliverability space to make it better, what would you like to see happen?

I would like to see the sender and receiver community get closer. If we were able to better communicate, or have information that we share - possibly even sharing information about bad senders. In this case, maybe a vetting tool would no longer be needed because you have all the bad senders identified at your fingertips. But then you’re looking at, from an ethical perspective, what qualifies as a “bad sender”?

ISPs feel it’s their responsibility to protect their mailboxes. I think that privacy is of utmost importance. I would just like to have some sort of secure communication channel to identify problems or issues and work more closely with them on certain things that data will help with. Like, I mentioned having some sort of data portal for each ISP or receiver to have that information.

If there was one area out of everything you do, what would you choose to automate?

As a consultant, it would be great to automate an audit. To go through and automate all the infrastructure checks and look through that for me, maybe to monitor bounce logs constantly. Something that can send alerts on what’s happening with the data and produce a detailed audit report.


comments powered by Disqus

Most Recent Blog Posts


This Week In Email March 28th 2016
Building and Maintaining a High Quality Email List
This Week In Email March 7th 2016
5 Important Things that Affect Email Delivery & How You Can Overcome Them
This Week In Email February 3rd 2016

View All Recent Posts >

Categories


Tags


What People Are Saying

In less than two weeks we went from an 87% reputation to 98% with SendGrid. We have pleased the ISP gods thanks to your team!
— Mikhail Avady, IP SmartUP
I was a bit desperate yesterday after MailChimp blocked one of my uploaded lists. It is clear that DataValidation solved this very quickly. Thanks a lot!
— Yves Van Hee, Atradius
DataValidation saved my life! I had to migrate the newsletter campaigns from a self-programmed system to Zoho Campaigns, and I recognized, too late, that the dataset was horrible. Zoho blocked me during the first campaign.
— Hans-Henning Schulz, Deutscher Verlag für Gesundh
I LOVE your service. I’ve used the MailChimp integration, which works like a dream. I will be recommending your service to all my MailChimp clients as a “good practice” tool to add to their arsenal.
— Bridget Gilchrist, Tin Soldier Ltd.
Thanks very much for cleaning my list, the service works very well.
— Ross Debos, Sunday SouLounge
Super. I didn't expect the Mailchimp integration. It made everything painless.
— Philip Owen, volgatrader.com
The service I have received has been fantastic. Without any doubt the best online service I have ever had. Thank you!
— Andrés Gómez-Peña, IDB
On our first eNews to nearly 2,500 subscribers, we had only 5 bounce-backs and 7 unsubscribes. No way that would have been possible without your service! Thanks, DataValidation, for keeping us in compliance!
— Jodie Rogers, University of Oregon
You guys are awesome. I've been looking for a platform like this for 2 months to vet media contacts for my startup so I don't trash our domain in spam traps. This was the most effective tool I've found, and I'll be using it again on the consumer side as we develop a direct email marketing campaign.
— Jared Criscuolo, seededbox.com
Y’all have a great service with a nice clean, user friendly interface. Glad to be able to have multiple versions of our list to make use of. No doubt I’ll be using the services of your company again in the near future.
— Cody Reid, Brunk Auctions
I'm very pleased with how fast I got a reply to my questions. Also very satified with the price and service. Great job.
— Joshua Guilfoyle, New York City, NY
Very useful — helped us get over the hump with our first import of 6-year old data to MailChimp. Now running much more smoothly!
— Alex English, Tampa Bay Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA)
Thanks Data Validation! It was easy to use and after I studied the definitions, I was able to re-sort my data for upload to MailChimp. In addition, your tips about sending emails to the Accepts All emails was extremely helpful!
— Jennifer Hoskins, PHR
It's awesome!! I was able to import the cleaned list of A's and B's into MailChimp no problem, whereas before cleaning with DV, MailChimp let me know a re-opt in would be required. I'm thrilled with this service!
— Lily Starling, ParkWinters.com
We tried DataValidation on advice from a colleague. The service was easy to link to Mailchimp, and was extremely affordable.
— Jodie Rogers, University of Oregon
We are VERY satisfied. Your service has refreshed our stale mailing list and contributed to the surrealistic celebration of the Domestic Research Society's 10th anniversary - high in the Julian Alps!
— Alenka Pirman, Domestic Research Team
Your service has been outstanding, and I especially liked your LiveChat feature - very helpful!
— Karen Burke, Crop King
We saved thousands of dollars that would have been spent on bounces and opt-outs by using DataValidation's cleaning tools. Now, we use their real-time protection so we never have a bad list again.
— Blake, Perdue for Senate
Thank you very much! Your service is super!
— Lexi Serebro, ToneDef.co.za
Thanks for your service, it was helpful and easy to use! MailChimp knew what they were doing when they recommended you.
— Abby Rubottom, FloridaPromise.org
We are very pleased with your service and fast turnaround time. We ran a small list through and then sampled those emails through our email platform.
— James J. Marks, Background Info USA

Tweets