The Deliverability Series is a collection of conversations intended to shed light on the intricate nature of deliverability and compliance. In this segment, Steve Henderson shares insights on UK email standards, email delivery best practices, and what needs to change in the email marketing space.
As the Compliance Officer at Communicator Corp, Henderson developed the email delivery, analytics, and reporting systems for Communicator. Currently, he is focused on recipient engagement analysis and international data protection and privacy regulations.
Look at every annual benchmark from every email institution, expert or agency, and you’ll see measurements which have nothing to do with the improvement and long-term optimization of an email marketing program. Undoing those ingrained and institutional beliefs is hard work.
I came into email delivery solutions as a developer 9 years ago. I've worked through the implementation of ISPs and email domains migrating from content-based delivery to reputation-based delivery. During this time I developed the email delivery systems for Communicator Corp, working with the huge changes we have seen in recent times. I've also worked with Return Path on their sender reputation reporting software and created the UK DMA Email Marketing Deliverability Best Practice Guide.
Recently, I have moved into compliance as a result of the current international push for more effective data protection, privacy regulations, and enforcement.
I work with literally every type and size of company. With email delivery, it’s far from just the “problem senders” who have issues. The email industry is constantly changing. ISPs change their standards and policies, and every email marketer experiences delivery issues. The companies I tend to work with are those wanting to solve a deliverability problem or achieve better results.
Since the introduction of reputation-based delivery, it has actually made delivery problem solving an awful lot easier. Pretty much every email domain and every ISP is pulling in the same direction; yes with different characteristics, but with the same fundamental message.
With most people, delivery issues come from data; specifically not having the best strategy for dealing with the lifecycle of customers and their data.
The US average inbox placement rate has been around 78%-82% for the past 4-5 years. In the UK, we average 90%-95% inbox placement rate. Because marketers now need to opt-in individuals before emailing, it’s an easier job for ESPs. UK minimum standards are US best practices.
Doing things the way they’ve always been done.
Many marketers, or marketing teams, have learned on the job; picking up practices from those who have come before them. These marketers report to management who tend to favor consistent year-on-year metrics; so they still ask for list growth and average open rate. Even worse, marketers may be incentivized to improve these metrics, which can actually be detrimental to email delivery and revenue. And it’s not just individual companies! Look at every annual benchmark from every email institution, expert or agency, and you’ll see measurements which have nothing to do with the improvement and long-term optimization of an email marketing program. Undoing those ingrained and institutional beliefs is hard work.
In the UK, and the wider EU, there are clear rules on using opted-in data. As long as the companies have recent and provable consent, the potential for delivery issues are minor. With that said, every piece of data imported or updated is checked against a database which looks for and prevents problems.
Delivery and compliance are linked more than you may think. Permission standards in the UK, and the wider EU, are higher than in the US. If you look at the difference between average inbox placement rates as reported by Return Path, you see that the US average inbox placement rate has been around 78%-82% for the past 4-5 years. In the UK, we average 90%-95% inbox placement rate. Because marketers now need to opt-in individuals before emailing, it’s an easier job for ESPs. UK minimum standards are US best practices, so delivery issues are far less common and much easier to solve here.
Absolutely. The best practices of organically grown-data; of having a positive and unambiguous opt-in process; of focusing on active data with a lifecycle-based strategy for reactivation and phasing-out long-term inactive data; and of long-term optimization instead of short-term gain all work together to create an email marketing strategy which delivers the best results long-term.
With email delivery, it’s far from just the “problem senders” who have issues. The email industry is constantly changing. ISPs change their standards and policies, and every email marketer experiences delivery issues.
Sending infrastructure, the data used for campaigns, and email content.
You need to make sure the servers, IPs and sending domains are secure and correctly configured. You need to use email lists which have an audit trail; so you can say for certain that you are sending to those who have recently subscribed or are active recipients. You also need the data to personalize, segment and target. The emails you send must be well-crafted, and relevant to the individuals who will receive them. These practices together provide a secure means of sending the right emails to the right people at the right time.
Two things, actually. Bounce codes need rethinking! The codes we have can’t accommodate the complex nature of email now, so ISPs and email domains are forced to make things up as they go. It means that every set of bounce codes from every domain is different from the next – it’s painful!
Secondly, for managers and directors who dictate marketing strategy to understand that high standards are good for business; that sending emails to people who don’t want them and/or people who don’t exist doesn’t work; and that email marketing is a rich landscape of intelligent solutions and not just an electronic version of direct mail.
In less than two weeks we went from an 87% reputation to 98% with SendGrid. We have pleased the ISP gods thanks to your team!— Mikhail Avady, IP SmartUP
I was a bit desperate yesterday after MailChimp blocked one of my uploaded lists. It is clear that DataValidation solved this very quickly. Thanks a lot!— Yves Van Hee, Atradius
DataValidation saved my life! I had to migrate the newsletter campaigns from a self-programmed system to Zoho Campaigns, and I recognized, too late, that the dataset was horrible. Zoho blocked me during the first campaign.— Hans-Henning Schulz, Deutscher Verlag für Gesundh
I LOVE your service. I’ve used the MailChimp integration, which works like a dream. I will be recommending your service to all my MailChimp clients as a “good practice” tool to add to their arsenal.— Bridget Gilchrist, Tin Soldier Ltd.
Thanks very much for cleaning my list, the service works very well.— Ross Debos, Sunday SouLounge
Super. I didn't expect the Mailchimp integration. It made everything painless.— Philip Owen, volgatrader.com
The service I have received has been fantastic. Without any doubt the best online service I have ever had. Thank you!— Andrés Gómez-Peña, IDB
On our first eNews to nearly 2,500 subscribers, we had only 5 bounce-backs and 7 unsubscribes. No way that would have been possible without your service! Thanks, DataValidation, for keeping us in compliance!— Jodie Rogers, University of Oregon
You guys are awesome. I've been looking for a platform like this for 2 months to vet media contacts for my startup so I don't trash our domain in spam traps. This was the most effective tool I've found, and I'll be using it again on the consumer side as we develop a direct email marketing campaign.— Jared Criscuolo, seededbox.com
Y’all have a great service with a nice clean, user friendly interface. Glad to be able to have multiple versions of our list to make use of. No doubt I’ll be using the services of your company again in the near future.— Cody Reid, Brunk Auctions
I'm very pleased with how fast I got a reply to my questions. Also very satified with the price and service. Great job.— Joshua Guilfoyle, New York City, NY
Very useful — helped us get over the hump with our first import of 6-year old data to MailChimp. Now running much more smoothly!— Alex English, Tampa Bay Regional Transportation Authority (TBARTA)
Thanks Data Validation! It was easy to use and after I studied the definitions, I was able to re-sort my data for upload to MailChimp. In addition, your tips about sending emails to the Accepts All emails was extremely helpful!— Jennifer Hoskins, PHR
It's awesome!! I was able to import the cleaned list of A's and B's into MailChimp no problem, whereas before cleaning with DV, MailChimp let me know a re-opt in would be required. I'm thrilled with this service!— Lily Starling, ParkWinters.com
We tried DataValidation on advice from a colleague. The service was easy to link to Mailchimp, and was extremely affordable.— Jodie Rogers, University of Oregon
We are VERY satisfied. Your service has refreshed our stale mailing list and contributed to the surrealistic celebration of the Domestic Research Society's 10th anniversary - high in the Julian Alps!— Alenka Pirman, Domestic Research Team
Your service has been outstanding, and I especially liked your LiveChat feature - very helpful!— Karen Burke, Crop King
We saved thousands of dollars that would have been spent on bounces and opt-outs by using DataValidation's cleaning tools. Now, we use their real-time protection so we never have a bad list again.— Blake, Perdue for Senate
Thank you very much! Your service is super!— Lexi Serebro, ToneDef.co.za
Thanks for your service, it was helpful and easy to use! MailChimp knew what they were doing when they recommended you.— Abby Rubottom, FloridaPromise.org
We are very pleased with your service and fast turnaround time. We ran a small list through and then sampled those emails through our email platform.— James J. Marks, Background Info USA